WebPeople v. Buckhalter (2001) Annotate this Case [No. S086220. July 9, 2001.] THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOE BUCKHALTER, Defendant and Appellant. (Superior Court … Web13. jún 2002 · Buckhalter does not apply in the case where a defendant's conviction is invalidated. It holds that “a felon once sentenced and committed to prison remains, despite a later remand on sentencing issues, in the custody of the Director, serving time against his ultimate sentence.

People v. Collins, No. B310570 Casetext Search + Citator

Web27. feb 2003 · Buckhalter, supra, 26 Cal.4th at pp. 29-30, 108 Cal.Rptr.2d 625, 25 P.3d 1103.) Although courts sometimes refer to it as a “sentence,” probation is not a sentence even if it includes a term in the county jail as a condition. (People v. Carter (1975) 48 Cal.App.3d 369, 375, 121 Cal.Rptr. 677.) WebSasser (2015) 61 Cal.4th 1, 15 [prior serious felony enhancement does “‘not attach to particular counts but 6 instead [is] added just once as the final step in computing the total sentence’”]; People v. Buckhalter (2001) 26 Cal.4th 20, 29 [when calculating credits at a resentencing, court must calculate them up to the date of the ... grammar school limassol fees

Lippincott

Web( People v. McLaughlin, 150 N.Y. 365, 386). This case clearly falls within the exceptions to the general rule, and as the evidence was relevant to the issue it was not inadmissible … Web2. aug 2016 · In People v. Buckhalter (2001) 26 Cal.4th 20, 23 ( Buckhalter ), our Supreme Court stated, "When . . . an appellate remand results in modification of a felony sentence … WebHolding in People v. Buckhalter (2001) 26 Cal.4th 20, that a prisoner serving a state prison sentence and who obtains a remand for resentence is entitled to conduct credit calculated at the postsentence rather than presentence rate, the Supreme Court expressly reserved the question of how the credit would be calculated when the underlying conviction… china silicone straws manufacturers